Book an Appointment
SBOM · FOR · AI

What's actually inside your AI?

SBOM for AI — the new G7 baseline. The EU AI Act countdown is running.

From 2 August 2026 the EU AI Act enters full enforcement. In March 2026 the G7 Cybersecurity Working Group published the first joint guidance for AI-SBOM: 50 minimum elements across 7 clusters. Without a structured inventory of your AI supply chain, compliance becomes a gamble — and risk a black box.

2 AUGUST 2026 · 00:00 CET
Until EU AI Act full enforcement2 AUGUST 2026 · 00:00 CET
34
Days
00
Hours
50
Minutes
09
Seconds
G7 · BSI · CISA · ANSSI · NCSC · ACN · CSE · NCO · EU Commission
50
minimum elements
7
clusters
9
G7 consensus baseline
35 M €
max. AI Act fine
01 · THE SILENT CATASTROPHE

One model. Six weeks. USD 847M.

February 2025 — a top-10 US bank. A state-of-the-art fraud-detection model from a renowned vendor. 94 % detection rate in testing. In production: a poisoned open-source base from Hugging Face. 100 % of trigger transactions were waved through.

$ 847 M
fraudulent transfers
Detected after6 weeksof undetected production
Vector1× HF modelpoisoned open-source base
Source: CyberSecFeed (2025) — emblematic of the 2024–2026 wave of AI supply-chain incidents.
02 · THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH

No one would eat yoghurt without an ingredient list. Yet almost every organisation deploys AI without knowing what's inside.

VISIBLE
What you see
The finished model
  • Model name & version
  • API endpoint
  • Marketing claims
  • A few benchmarks
INVISIBLE
What's actually inside
The invisible supply chain
  • Base model + distillation ancestors
  • Training data · provenance unclear
  • LoRA adapters & fine-tuning stages
  • Pickle files · code-execution risk
  • Third-party APIs & MCP tools
03 · REAL INCIDENTS · 2024 – 2026

The AI supply chain is no longer a textbook problem.

The pattern: trust is pushed upstream — and no one controls it.

2024
JFrog × Hugging Face
≈ 100 malicious models found — reverse shells that execute code on load.
Q1 2025
Model poisoning in production
Banks & hospitals report backdoored models from "reputable" sources. 23 % of top-1,000 models compromised.
03/2026
LiteLLM hijacked on PyPI
≈ 500,000 credentials potentially exfiltrated — including API keys from Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic.
04/2026
Bitwarden CLI & PyTorch Lightning
Compromised for 90 / 42 minutes. Payload targets Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI ("Mini Shai-Hulud").
04 · THE G7 ANSWER

What is an SBOM for AI?

A machine-readable ingredient list for AI systems — structured evidence of every component, dependency and supply-chain relationship that flows into an AI system.

Transparency

Which models, datasets, frameworks, GPUs and third-party APIs are in the system? Inventory, not assumption.

Compliance

Evidence for EU AI Act, NIS2, CRA, BSI TR-03183 — machine-processable, signable, audit-ready.

Responsiveness

When a zero-day hits, know in hours not weeks: are we affected? Which models? Which endpoints?

05 · THE G7 FRAMEWORK · MARCH 2026

Seven clusters. Fifty minimum elements. One shared baseline.

BSI · ACN · ANSSI · CSE · CISA · NCSC · NCO · EU Commission jointly published the first set of minimum elements in March 2026. Seven clusters cover the entire AI lifecycle — from provenance to performance.

10
Metadata
the SBOM itself
9
System Level Properties
the system as a whole
13
Models
the AI brain
10
Datasets
the AI fuel
2
Infrastructure
the AI substrate
4
Security Properties
the defences
2
Key Performance Indicators
the measurement
CISO highlight: Models + Datasets + Security Properties — this is where it diverges from a classical SBOM.
06 · CLUSTER · DEEP-DIVE

Three clusters where risk is decided.

MODELS · 13 ELEMENTS

Who built the brain?

Identity, lineage, weights, hash, training method, license and external references for every model in the system.

  • Model name, identifier, version, timestamp
  • Producer — pre-trained / fine-tuned / distilled
  • Hash + algorithm (integrity check)
  • Architecture, parameters, hyperparameters
  • Training properties: RLHF · DPO · PPO · GRPO
  • License: open weight / architecture / data
  • Lineage: parent & derived models
  • External refs: Model Card · paper · JSON schema
Why this detailed? So after a zero-day in a base model you see within minutes which fine-tuned variants are affected.
DATASETS · 10 ELEMENTS

What did it learn from?

Provenance, content, statistical properties, sensitivity and license of every dataset across the AI lifecycle.

  • Name & description · pre-train / fine-tune / eval
  • Content & format · finance · medical · JSON · image · audio
  • Identifier & hash · URL + cryptographic fingerprint
  • Provenance · crawling · purchase · labeling steps
  • Statistical properties · bias-relevant metrics
  • Sensitivity · PII · copyright · medical · national security
  • Dependency relations · which tools shaped it
  • License · link to the license document
This is often where your GDPR, copyright and AI-Act exposure is decided — long before the model is even deployed.
SECURITY · INFRASTRUCTURE · KPI · 8 ELEMENTS

Substrate, defences & measurement

What runs the system? How is it defended? How do we measure robustness and performance?

Security Properties

Encryption · RBAC · I/O filters · adversarial robustness · prompt-injection defence · ISO/IEC 27001 · 42001 · SOC 2 · security.txt link

Infrastructure

Frameworks (PyTorch · TF · vLLM · Ollama · Triton) · package managers · third-party libs · runtimes · HBOM link for AI silicon

Key Performance Indicators

Adversarial robustness · manipulation resilience · uptime · latency · throughput · load balancing · incident resolution time

07 · THE COUNTDOWN

2 August 2026 — the EU AI Act goes full force.

Art. 50 transparency duties. Annex III high-risk systems. Technical documentation, risk management, data governance, cybersecurity evidence. Logging — all evidenced and machine-processable.

€ 35 M
7 % group revenue
for prohibited practices
€ 15 M
3 % group revenue
for transparency & high-risk breaches (incl. missing SBOM content)
Annex III
HIGH-RISK
HR · credit · education · CI · justice · biometrics
08 · THE READINESS GAP

While the clock ticks, most are not ready.

26.2 %
have started concrete AI-Act compliance activities at all
19.4 %
self-classify as "poorly prepared"
> 50 %
do not even have a full AI-system inventory
Deloitte AI-Act Survey 2026 · TrueScreen Compliance Tracker 2026
09 · WHAT CISOs DO NOW

Five steps to SBOM-for-AI readiness.

01
Inventory
Complete list of every AI model, agent and API in use — including shadow AI in business units.
02
Classify
Determine risk tier under the EU AI Act. Prioritise high-risk systems per Annex III.
03
Choose tooling
CycloneDX 1.7 / SPDX, AIBOM generators (Cybeats, Manifest, OWASP CycloneDX AI working group).
04
Automate
Hook SBOM generation into CI/CD, the model registry and your MLOps pipeline. Enforce hash signatures.
05
Integrate
Wire to vuln scanning, VEX and the ISMS risk register. Adjust procurement contracts.
10 · VAMISEC · FROM OBLIGATION TO ARCHITECTURE

How VamiSec makes you SBOM-for-AI-ready.

AI-system inventory

Capture every productive AI system, model, agent and MCP tool — including shadow AI.

AIBOM implementation

From pilot to full rollout: CycloneDX 1.7, pipeline integration, model signing.

EU AI Act gap analysis

Map your systems to Art. 50, Annex III and the technical documentation duties.

AI security & governance

Adversarial-robustness tests, prompt-injection defence, AI risk register.

vCISO / AI Officer

Managed service for AI governance, ISMS and compliance — on demand.

Continuous monitoring

SBOM-diff watching, VEX workflow, AI vulnerability pipeline.

ACT NOW

Let's talk — before 2 August arrives.

30 minutes free strategy call on your SBOM-for-AI and EU-AI-Act roadmap. We align the G7 baseline, BSI TR-03183 and your concrete ML pipeline.

Book a 30-min Teams demo
Direct slot · 30 minutes · Microsoft Teams · no obligation